Online access to case information for payments in pick juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases can be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is additionally a very well-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may well interfere with the summary or even the finding and mildew the relief to make it ideal for the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or even the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is predicted that the persons having their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to some Government service is the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: fifteen-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—is definitely the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Please use a person username and password established from the options. If it does not work please consider the other. Just about every allows single consumer access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have completed your session in Manupatra.
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Relating the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service of your grievance notice is a mandatory necessity along with a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation involves that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In the event the organization is transprovincial.
This guide offers useful insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case regulation, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
Case regulation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, is actually a law that is based on precedents, that will be the judicial decisions from previous cases, rather than legislation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution could be justified when The essential norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is put in its place.
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her six-month report into the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to the person, by performing an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently risky that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death of your these person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to enhancing the effectiveness of your regulation in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.
P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to watch that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are totally different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz read more v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held via the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--